Date   
Re: Is there any plans to use ALL features of SPDX 2.1 specification in future releases?

Michael C. Jaeger
 

Hello,

currently, I am not aware of the FOSSology project planning to support "ALL features of SPDX 2.1 specification in future releases", for a number of reasons, just a few examples:

* Spec 2.1 supports identification of code snippets (See section 5), currently fossology does not support it and I am not aware of plans by someone to contribute it
* Spec 2.1 support for example besides the copyright statement also a file contributor, which could be taken, maybe, from some SCM information. I am not aware of plans here neither
* ...

and so forth. I think FOSSology will support only parts of the SPDX 2.1 spec as they are covered by the application functionality.

I am not sure of that answer covers your question? The fact that you have used bold types letters in your e-mail provides a slight impression that you expect something in particular from the FOSSology project?

Maybe the following two issues provide also helpful information to you?

https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/1309
https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/112

Please do not hesitate to clarify what you intended to say about our release notes or our idea of SPDX 2.1 document generation.

Kind regards, Michael

On 12. Mar 2019, at 13:30, thuy.tran.xh@... wrote:

Hi all,

As announced in the release, https://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki/FOSSology-3.1-Release-Announcement-(Working-Version)

Key features in FOSSology 3.1 are:
Support for SPDX 2.1 document formats(tag:value format now available as well as RDF)

I have tried the fossology installation in the ways of docker as well as from source.
From the template (Only package/ document/file information) at https://github.com/fossology/fossology/tree/master/src/spdx2/agent/template, we could not generate SPDX 2.1 FULL features at https://spdx.org/spdx-specification-21-web-version

Is there any plans to use ALL features of SPDX 2.1 specification in future releases?
Thank you.

Regards,
Thuy Tran.

Release of 3.5.0

Shaheem Azmal M MD
 

Hello all,

After two release candidates, making fixes for REST API installation and various migration tests, FOSSology is stable enough for a new release. The main features of the 3.5.0 release can be found under RC1.

Particular corrections after RC1 can be found under RC2.

Mainly 3.5.0 adds more documentation, infrastructure improvements and support for brand new FOSSology REST API. A brief introduction about the REST API can be found at:

https://www.fossology.org/get-started/basic-rest-api-calls/

Moreover, new functionality has improved JSON output for nomos and restructured license detection for nomos. Last but not the least, FOSSology now have capabilities to ignore files specific to version control systems from the scanning improving scan times.

Credits

From the git commit history, we have following contributors since 3.4.0:

@ag4ums,
@ChristopheRequillart,
@AMDmi3,
@GMishx,
@mcieno,
@max-wittig,
@maxhbr,
@rlintu,
@sandipbhuyan,
@shaheemazmalmmd


Please find the release and binary packages for Debian and Ubuntu based systems here https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/3.5.0 

Thanks & Regards
Shaheem Azmal M MD

Need to remove Debian packaging meta info from master branch

Gaurav Mishra
 

Hello all,

 

During our effort to publish FOSSology as a Debian package, we got few suggestions from the Debian community.

One of those suggestion is to remove the Debian packaging information (debian folder) from the master branch and put it into another branch like chore/debian/jessie.

 

This is done so to avoid conflicts as Debian maintainers will be editing this packaging information in the FOSSology mirror (hosted at Debian Sala). And any change in upstream can result in conflicts.

 

As this change will alter the packaging steps required by many of FOSSology users, we need your feedback.

 

I have opened an issue on GitHub for the same: https://github.com/fossology/fossology/issues/1341

 

Kindly respond either on this thread or on the GitHub issue if you have any concerns regarding the same.

With best regards,
Gaurav Mishra